Shifting the Public Understanding of Nuclear Technology from Gen II to Gen IV

Abstract

The deployment of new nuclear technologies requires a shift in communication strategies for public engagement. Public opinion is one of the main barriers to the increased use of nuclear energy, medicine, and technology. Public opinion weighs into policy creation, election platforms, and political stance. This impact on nuclear development has been seen notably in Thailand, Japan, and Germany where is has led to the shutdowns of existing plants and cancellation of new builds.

A major challenge in modern public engagement on nuclear projects is the communication of updated technology and mitigation of risk. Major accidents occurring in generation I and II reactors are top-of- mind for many Canadians during discussions of new nuclear construction. The safety advancements present in generation IV reactors are not generally understood by the public and members of the public may not believe these designs have eliminated the potential for many accident types to occur.

Individuals outside the nuclear field typically assess all reactors as being equal in risk. Comparisons to major accidents such as Chernobyl and Three Mile Island (TMI) are common, and the communication strategy utilized for new technology must first address the fundamental differences in reactor design before a constructive conversation can begin. This paper suggests strategies for communicating safety improvements and engaging with the public regarding Gen IV reactors.