Cernavoda NPP's Performance and Its Availability to Supply Steam for District Heating

Main Article Content

Mircea Metes
Mihai Casota
Gh. Diaconu

Abstract

The paper presents the results of the warranty/ performance tests carried-out at Unit 1 of Cernavoda NPP(Romania), during 1997, and the availability of the unit, confirmed at the tests, to supply steam for the district heating ,without reducing the electrical outputAmong the tests' results , extremely good seems the Gross Heat Rate which allowed the turbogenerator -706,5 MWe design capacity - to actually generate 7 18,4 MWe, while the reactor was loaded at 99,l percent. Based onthis result, an assessment was initiated of the possibility to increase the rated electrical output of the Unit; the analysisbeing now in progress.The tests demonstrated the availability of an additional steam flow, in comparison with the flow required forthe rated electrical output., Based on this result, a decision was taken, in order to provide heat for district heating: toextract the steam directly from the Unit's steam header, fed by the Steam Generators, maintaining the design ratedelectrical output Thus, the modifications required for the operation of the turbine in co- generation were postponed.A comparative analysis is presented in the paper for two alternatives : # I - steam taken directly from theUnit's steam header , and # I1 - turbogenerator operated in co-generation , with the extraction of the steam from the exitof the High Pressure (HP) cylinder of the turbine. The basic assumption in this analysis - acceptable for a limited heatdemand - is that the electrical power and the thermal power for heating are equal in both alternatives.The calculation proves that the higher thermal eiliciency of the operation in co-generation (alternative # 11)leads to in~i~casanvtin gs in the consumption of nuclear fuel.The operation of the turbine in co-generation (alternative # 11) becomes really efficient, from economical pointof view, only when the heat load will be so large that the additional steam flow, mentioned above, will be not sufficientto cover all the heat demand; hence, for getting more steam will be necessary to reduce the electrical output. Suchthreshold of heat demand for Cernavoda NPP Unit 1 is at 30 - 33 Gcal/h. The drop in electrical output will be smaller inalternative // II than in alternative # I; from this difference , will rise the main advantage of co-generation at CernavodaNPP Unit I.

Article Details

Section
Articles